Geophysical research letters grl paper
The research area is not representative of an AGU discipline. Presentation Category C.
Geophysical research letters citation style
Figure or table captions too succinct. Paper is a routine application of a standard research technique or a new measurement or laboratory method. This has been around for several years now and I have written about it several times. English usage and grammar detract from the paper but can easily be improved. People on this side of the argument have calm rationality on our side, it is our main weapon and this type of behaviour undermines this premise. Godsent for those who do not know LaTeX. Figures of good quality but difficult to read e. Science Category 4. Possible reasons include: Manuscript is not well written, or not logically organized, or inadequately illustrated. There are major scientific errors in the manuscript.
Paper has little immediate impact on the research of others. Figures of good quality but difficult to read e.
And that is not the reviewers opinions but the editors who has refused to give feedbackinstead his boss as made this claim. For example: The manuscript presents some unclear or incomplete scientific reasoning.
With this goal, the Editorial Board evaluates manuscripts submitted to GRL according to the following criteria: High impact innovative results with broad geophysical implications at the forefront of one or several AGU disciplines. The technique is not useful.
The manuscript presents some inadequate description of data, model, or interpretation missing tables, figures incomplete, supplementary material incomplete, etc. This has been around for several years now and I have written about it several times.
Geophysical research letters letpub
Captions contain all the necessary information to understand figures and tables. Read More Earth and Planetary Sciences. Read More Wiley Geophysical Research Letters Geophysical Research Letters publishes short, concise research letters that present scientific advances that are likely to have immediate influence on the research of other investigators. As the article states, GRL serves a particular role in geoscience research, and we should respect that role and honor the service of the editors and reviewers that make GRL a rapid-publication, high-impact publication. English usage and grammar detract from the paper but can easily be improved. Paper is a routine application of a standard research technique or a new measurement or laboratory method. Manuscript needs to be and can be shortened.
Read More Earth and Planetary Sciences. Title needs revision.
Geophysical research letters impact factor
Manuscript is well written, is logically organized, includes sections with headers, and is adequately illustrated. For questions, please contact grlonline agu. For example: The manuscript presents some unclear or incomplete scientific reasoning. I work in a research lab and it is great to format my papers so quick so easily. Figures and tables are understandable and readable when sized for GRL. Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. If you are submitting to GRL and demanding rapid publication, then you should be ready to work quickly to make that rapid timeline. Figures of good quality but difficult to read e. Read More Earth and Planetary Sciences. If there major in nature why are they so hard to describe in practice? Paper does not present sufficient innovation. Significant data analysis or modeling is required to substantiate the conclusions. GRL also publishes a limited number of frontier articles, by invitation from Editors.
It is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers such as Word did not really evolve in recent years. As it stands,all this means is that another journals editorial team now who thinks a little less of the behaviours of skeptical sceintists and sees us all as conspipracy kooks.
based on 113 review